News RSS Feed


Closure of major roads after accidents is questioned

10:38am Thursday 8th May 2008

comment Comments (36)   Have your say »

By Richard Harris »

MASSIVE congestion and thousands of lost man hours can be the consequences of closing roads following serious accidents.

A leading Selby councillor has now questioned the need to close major roads for hours on end after serious crashes.

Coun Brian Percival, deputy leader of Selby District Council, questioned the police's decision to close a junction on the A1 for seven hours after a fatal road accident on April 28.

The accident near Bramham, after which a 35-year-old man from the Sheffield area died, happened shortly before 1.30am.

The A1 was closed at that point until 8.10am the same morning, which caused chaos for motorists as tailbacks formed on roads going through Tadcaster and into York.

While not wanting to downplay the tragedy of the accident, Coun Percival questioned whether it was necessary to keep the road closed for seven hours.

He said: "I can understand and fully support the closing of roads in order to save those injured in vehicle crashes, but there has to be an examination of the time required to record and clean up after such accidents because of the economic loss suffered by those caught in the consequential delays.

"Is there not a case for looking at pushing the vehicles into a location that will permit the roads to be opened earlier and for screening off the affected areas to curtail rubbernecking from drivers travelling in the opposite direction?"

But North Yorkshire Police has defended the need to close major roads for long periods.

A spokeswoman said all unnatural deaths had to be investigated and that roads were closed so that evidence was not lost or disturbed and its position recorded.

She said: "The vehicles cannot be pushed off the road, most of the cars will have been damaged to the point they cannot be pushed, so this would then require the use of a recovery truck to move the vehicles.

"But in the process of moving the vehicles, we would have disturbed the scene and the recovery truck may have destroyed evidence. We would also be faced with finding a suitable location for the examination of the vehicles."

Your Say YourPress

Rob Marley, Haxby says...
11:00am Thu 8 May 08

'Droopy' is insenstive again. Be a different story if it was your son or wife they were scraping up off the road Councillor.

If you want to stop congestion, invest in the railways and get as much freight off the roads as possible. Mind you, fuel prices are doing that.

The road network is clogged and accidents happen. Invest in the railways, make them public and build new lines.

Somebody, York says...
11:04am Thu 8 May 08

Hmmm, I knew councillors were dumb, but Coun Percival takes the biscuit...
Let the pilce do their job PROPERLY and get on with er, doing what ever else it is you do.
Maybe you should get off your well proportioned bottom and join the police on an accident investigation and see if yu can gather all the information needed any quicker!

The Stigs Wife, york says...
11:11am Thu 8 May 08

Closure of major roads after accidents is questioned


Shouldnt that be "closure of major roads after accident is questioned"??
or
"Closure of major roads after accidents ARE questioned?"

Silver, York says...
11:14am Thu 8 May 08

I can see what he's after but it's impossible...after all it's not like accidents are all the same....have to say making a statement like this to the reasonable world shows how outta touch you are with reality

thin libby, york says...
11:45am Thu 8 May 08

about time too.let common sense prevail.

OldFart, York says...
11:48am Thu 8 May 08

The Stigs Wife wrote:
Closure of major roads after accidents is questioned Shouldnt that be "closure of major roads after accident is questioned"?? or "Closure of major roads after accidents ARE questioned?"
Are you serious or is this a tongue-in-cheek pop?

fyi "Closure...... is questioned" is the correct grammar. It's not the accidents that are being questioned.

Milton, York says...
12:18pm Thu 8 May 08

This seems rather crass and insensitive. I'm sure the police only close roads when they have to.
And please refrain from using sexist language such as "man" hours. I

YorkIbiza, York says...
12:33pm Thu 8 May 08

Hope your not being serious Milton, sexist language, get a life.

Peter, york says...
12:45pm Thu 8 May 08

Milton wrote:
This seems rather crass and insensitive. I'm sure the police only close roads when they have to. And please refrain from using sexist language such as "man" hours. I
The original definition of man is human being, the term women was created to distinguish females. Therefore the term man when used in it's origanal context is NOT sexist

The Stigs Wife, york says...
2:30pm Thu 8 May 08

Yes OldFart, it was tongue in cheek!!
The amount of bad grammar the press usually use!!

Guy Fawkes, Bootham says...
2:35pm Thu 8 May 08

Councillor Percival picked on the wrong incident as a case study. Of course fatalities need to be properly investigated, but there have been recent cases where the A64 between the A1 and the outer ring road has been closed for several hours after no more than a minor rear-end shunt which didn't cause any injuries.

I suspect the answer is that insurance companies are demanding extensive forensic investigations and are increasingly willing to try and sue the police for damages if they can't provide evidence of having done them. In the event of accidents which cause no more than damage to property, I agree completely with Cllr. Percival: drag the wreckage off the road and get it repoened ASAP.

A user, Selby says...
2:48pm Thu 8 May 08

I can see where Cllr P is coming from. The problem with the accident in Q is that is was rather dark at the time so they had to wait for the sun to wake up. I know lights can be used but you can see things easier in normal daylight

I do have to say though that some closures are too long but I think GF has it right regarding the insurance companies.

hydroman, York says...
2:59pm Thu 8 May 08

I agree with the councillor. Yes, investigations are needed, but the indirect cost of that particular closure would certainly have run to 6 figures or more. Think were we were 20 years ago and consider where we are going. These investigations get lengthier and more costly year on year. At some point, the balance will have to be struck between the cost (including inderect costs) and the benefit. It has probably gone too far the wrong way. You can compare this dilema to the NHS, balancing cost against benefit. We would all like to have every possible treatment made available when we need it, but cost does not permit. Unfortunatley, in the case of road closures, there does not seem to be any rigerous assessment of the cost of ensuing delays.

Bemused, York says...
4:33pm Thu 8 May 08

Posted by: Bemused, York on 10:27am Mon 28 Apr 08
West Yorkshire police officers closed the A1 and its junction with the A64 at 1.40am and the road remained closed until 8.10 this morning while crash investigators examined the scene.

Ludicrous, and yes, it's WEST Yorkshire and it's still ludicrous!

Posted by: Bemused, York on 11:04am Mon 28 Apr 08
Ludicrous and unnecessary, it does not take 7 hours to investigate a two car prang.
Serious damage to the economy, key emergency service and other workers unable to get into work, grid lock preventing emergency service access to
many tens of square miles.
On health & safely grounds alone it's ludicrous and dangerous.

Posted by: Bemused, York on 12:00pm Mon 28 Apr 08
It took 11 hours to discover that a woman crossing the A64 at Bilborough hadn't looked where she was going. A similar amount of time that an accident on the A1 was caused by a HGV doing an illegal U turn.
The lunacy continues, other lives are put at risk and it costs millions a year.

Well done Coun Brian Percival, the voice of reason.

Billy Boy, York says...
4:38pm Thu 8 May 08

The good old Caped Crusader bemused slates the police again, not like when you was in the force eh, Its quite obvious why they close them for so long, and that is to establish what happened, or have you forgot bemused what it was like!!

Bemused, York says...
5:00pm Thu 8 May 08

Its quite obvious why they close them for so long, and that is to establish what happened, or have you forgot bemused what it was like!!

I have another theory. Lacking common sense, intelligence and most of all training, clueless headless chickens in police uniform, or in my view imitating real police officers, attend the scene of a road accident.

In the past an intelligent and perceptive police officer of a breed now extinct would quickly assess the situation, speak to a few witnesses and get an extremely accurate picture as to what had happened.

Today, they are absolutely clueless and don't know where to start and follow a handbook written by the Association of Chief Police Officers, a quango without any authority in law, made up of senior officers, today mainly fast-tracked to Inspector level on the basis that they hold an increasingly worthless university degree, but lacking common sense as well as the all important experience.

At the scene of the accident the ACPO handbook is laboriously gone through, roads are closed for hours on end, in order that with luck they eventually come to the conclusions any real police officer would have arrived at within minutes.

Such as the accident on the A1 being caused by an HGV carelessly doing a U-turn, and the unfortunate woman was killed on the A 64 didn't look when she
was crossing.


Billy Boy, York says...
7:30pm Thu 8 May 08

Bemused wrote:
Its quite obvious why they close them for so long, and that is to establish what happened, or have you forgot bemused what it was like!!

I have another theory. Lacking common sense, intelligence and most of all training, clueless headless chickens in police uniform, or in my view imitating real police officers, attend the scene of a road accident.

In the past an intelligent and perceptive police officer of a breed now extinct would quickly assess the situation, speak to a few witnesses and get an extremely accurate picture as to what had happened.

Today, they are absolutely clueless and don't know where to start and follow a handbook written by the Association of Chief Police Officers, a quango without any authority in law, made up of senior officers, today mainly fast-tracked to Inspector level on the basis that they hold an increasingly worthless university degree, but lacking common sense as well as the all important experience.

At the scene of the accident the ACPO handbook is laboriously gone through, roads are closed for hours on end, in order that with luck they eventually come to the conclusions any real police officer would have arrived at within minutes.

Such as the accident on the A1 being caused by an HGV carelessly doing a U-turn, and the unfortunate woman was killed on the A 64 didn't look when she
was crossing.

Solicitor, So PC Crusader, how do you know my client was doing 80 mph and killed the baby in the back,

PC Crusader, well sir Mrs Miggins told me so,

Solicitor, did you carryout any forensic and crash investigation tests .

PC Crusader, Well no, any Intelligent perceptive police officer of a breed that is now extinct knows he was, by just assessing the situation and asking a few witnesses, that is how i come to my accurate picture of what happened.

Judge. NOT GUILTY.

you make me laugh bemused. Glad we dont have them now extinct police officers now lol

Bemused, York says...
7:46pm Thu 8 May 08

you make me laugh bemused. Glad we dont have them now extinct police officers now lol

You demonstrate you haven't a clue what you are talking about Billy Boy, and I strongly suspect the public would prefer a proper police force that actually dealt with crimes, was not too scared to deal with public disorder, and would never have allowed the city centre to be a beggars' paradise. Nor did we cause roads to be closed off for hours after simple two car accidents.

Redr, york says...
9:52pm Thu 8 May 08

That’s a two car accident in which a man died Bemused. If it was a member of my family I wouldn’t give a t0ss how inconvenient the road closure was. I would want to know that a proper investigation had taken place in order to establish the cause of the accident, with the added benefit of hopefully learning how to avoid such an accident in the future.

Bemused, York says...
10:04pm Thu 8 May 08

That’s a two car accident in which a man died Bemused. If it was a member of my family I wouldn’t give a t0ss how inconvenient the road closure was. I would want to know that a proper investigation had taken place in order to establish the cause of the accident, with the added benefit of hopefully learning how to avoid such an accident in the future.

Won't throw more light on the cause, nor make an iota of difference to the outcome, and what you would want is irrelevant.

But this stupidity costs the economy millions, causes gridlock and puts lives at risk, and shows gross incompetence.

Redr, york says...
10:51pm Thu 8 May 08

Won't throw more light on the cause

A proper investigation will.
nor make an iota of difference to the outcome

Evidence should make a difference.
and what you would want is irrelevant

Bereaved family members questions should not be treated as irrelevant.
But this stupidity costs the economy millions

The economic impact is serious but not as important as human life.
causes gridlock and puts lives at risk

Gridlock, true but if managed correctly should not put life at risk.
and shows gross incompetence.

The true reason behind all of your above statements. Another attack on your former employer.

Silver, York says...
10:55pm Thu 8 May 08

I do know the police work very quickly to accidents last month I witnessed a minor crash which I phoned in. they were there in minutes by the time I'd finished the job that needed to be done as part of my job they'd reopened both lanes. The only thing I found bad was that I was the only one who rang it in....

Bemused, York says...
11:36pm Thu 8 May 08

Redr, stick to what you know. I've investigated many road accidents in my time, some of which were tragically fatal, and prepared successful prosecution files, so about this subject I know a thing or two.

In answer to silver, they are OK with very minor accidents, but if they are more than that they panic and the ACPO manual comes out.

Me, Selby says...
2:04am Fri 9 May 08

Bemused wrote:
Redr, stick to what you know. I've investigated many road accidents in my time, some of which were tragically fatal, and prepared successful prosecution files, so about this subject I know a thing or two. In answer to silver, they are OK with very minor accidents, but if they are more than that they panic and the ACPO manual comes out.
Speak the truth Bemused.

You took statements! The job of investigating collisions is down to the Accident Investigation Branch, or now the Collision Investigation Unit.

Unless you have been part of this unit or hold an advanced certificate in accident reconstruction, you would have been told to butt out.

Taking statements from witnesses is not doing the work at the scene such as skid tests, damage profile measurements, light bulb examinations etc, etc.

But then again, you will say you have, because you think that most people on here don't know what you are on about!

Billy Boy, York says...
8:16am Fri 9 May 08

And I know what i am talking about!!

Bemused, York says...
9:58am Fri 9 May 08

Taking statements from witnesses is not doing the work at the scene such as skid tests, damage profile measurements, light bulb examinations etc, etc.

Vehicle examiners did their job away from the scene, we had long tape measures for skid marks! The rest is making much to do of naff all and job creation for that well known ABC club - "Anything Bar Coppering". I'd be more impressed if as much effort was put into dealing with crime and public disorder, the things that so blight the everyday lives of the long suffering British public.

Today the lunatics have taken over the asylum, the damage to the economy, the gridlock and consequent risk to lives, cannot be justified. Closure of the A64 at Bilborough for 11 hours to discover that a woman died because she wasn't looking when she crossed during the hours of darkness - that was the inquest verdict - was ridiculous.

If you have somewhere to be to catch a flight, a ferry, or an important business appointment, you live in fear of a some numpty in uniform at the scene of a simple road 'collision' having a panic attack and causing gridlock for a many dozens of square miles in your vicinity.

The government appears concerned about road congestion. Someone ought to tell them who's causing much of it.
worse despite anti-jam pledge
8:33am today

Traffic jams on Britain's major roads have got worse despite a Government pledge to ease congestion.

The Times newspaper said official figures showed the average motorist now spent an extra 10 seconds at a standstill for every 10 miles on 100 key routes.

Ministers had set a target of cutting delays on the "strategic road network" - the most important motorways and A roads - from 2005 levels, it said.

A Department for Transport spokesman was unable to comment on the specific figures.

He said: "To help meet growing demand for travel the Government has increased transport spending by 60% since 1997.

"The Government is making record investments in public transport, building new road capacity where appropriate - including major widening projects on the M1 and M25 - and exploring ways to get more from our existing roads, such as opening up hard shoulders to traffic to ease congestion."

© Copyright Press Association Ltd 2008, All Rights Reserved.

TJH, York says...
12:09pm Fri 9 May 08

Bemused.

You KNEW a thing about this subject but you are years out of date. Suggest you write to the Chief Constable and ask if you can spend a day with CIU and see what they can prove in Court with technology in 2008 compared what you could achieve with a tape measure and a bit of yellow chalk. Oh, and while you're there, you might want to ask about all the offences relating to road death that weren't on the statute book when you were serving. (Clue - death by careless driving carrying custodial sentence rather than only being able to prosecute for due care, fine and points on the licence).

Once you've done that come back with your 'expert' views. Everyone else apart from you and the good Councillor seems to have grasped that death on the road can be an unlawful kiling, just the same as murder or manslaughter by any other means.

And your comment 'some numpty in uniform' says a lot more about you than it does about the officers serving today.


Now off you go and do some more cutting and pasting........

Bemused, York says...
12:23pm Fri 9 May 08

I suspect that if ever consulted, the public at large would agree with me, and consider the congestion, national economic and personal financial losses, missed appointments and ruined holidays, and the danger to life caused by the emergency services being unable to attend other incidents such as fires and illness requiring an ambulance, and consider risks and losses are NOT justified.

TJH, York says...
1:30pm Fri 9 May 08

The people you should ask are the family, friends etc of someone killed by bad driving - for everyone else it's only about inconvenience. If you have dealt with as many fatals as you claim then you'd know that.

Redr, york says...
3:26pm Fri 9 May 08

Thanks for the advice Bemused but I think you will find that 1) I don’t need your permission to offer an opinion. 2) It’s clear that serving officers don’t agree with you. 3) I suspect that if the public at large were ever consulted they would express a preference for thorough investigations into fatal accidents.

AdmiralN, York Centre says...
4:56pm Fri 9 May 08

I suspect that if ever consulted, the public at large would agree with me,


Im not so sure reading this thread bemused,

3) I suspect that if the public at large were ever consulted they would express a preference for thorough investigations into fatal accidents.


I agree

If someone like bemused tells me that shutting the road costs £100000+ it would mean diddly squat, i wouldnt care. Its a bit like saying it is cheaper to just kill cancer sufferers instead of investing millions in developing a cure.

i do see your point bemused and appreciate your 'knowledge' but your view on this thread seems terribly old fashioned and dare i say... a little bigoted.

Bemused, York says...
6:40pm Fri 9 May 08

3) I suspect that if the public at large were ever consulted they would express a preference for thorough investigations into fatal accidents.

You don't have to do what they do to be 'thorough', and wait till there's a real tragedy because a fire engine or ambulance couldn't get through the gridlock.

OldFart, York says...
12:48am Sat 10 May 08

Bemused wrote:
3) I suspect that if the public at large were ever consulted they would express a preference for thorough investigations into fatal accidents.
You don't have to do what they do to be 'thorough', and wait till there's a real tragedy because a fire engine or ambulance couldn't get through the gridlock.
Bemused, Please define what you mean by 'thorough'. I am all for keeping roads open asap, but not at the expense of gaining full evidence of the event. Are you suggesting that roads are closed for longer than is absolutely necessary and that the Police could be quicker in their investigations but choose to spin it out for some reason?

Bemused, York says...
9:53pm Sat 10 May 08

Following the closure of the A64 at Bilborough for 8 hours, (I got it wrong, not 11 hours), this is part of the Press report of the inquest
Inquest hears mother took fatal short cut to get to work
By Nicola Fifield
Speaking at the inquest, Traffic Constable Graham McCulloch said Mrs
Hosova must have thought there was a suitable gap in the traffic, but got it wrong.
He said: "There is little doubt in my mind that she has led to her own
demise."

Now when you consider the accident took place just in December during the early morning hours of darkness, at a very dangerous crossing point where the deceased would have had to climb over the crash barrier to get to the motel where she worked, I don't think closing the road off for 8 hours was required to work out she didn't look where she was going.

If you do so be it, but I don't, and it's happening because they are going step by step through an instruction manual and not using either intelligence or common sense.

The grid lock, economic damage and danger caused by blocking emergency access over wide areas can only be called disproportionate in respect of what they are laboriously investigating like robots as they follow the manual line by line.

And for all the costs involved, I haven't noticed an increase in convictions for 'causing death by whatever it is today driving', even if it's been made easier to prove by changes in the law.


Billy Boy, York says...
7:38pm Sun 11 May 08

Now go and see the Padre

Bemused, York says...
10:15am Mon 12 May 08

ROFL

Your sayYourPress

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE York Press account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?
Coun Brian Percival Coun Brian Percival

What's On Live Travel YourPress

July 2008
SMTWTFS
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2

Hot Jobs

Your Local Services


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Sponsored Adverts By Yahoo